Connect with us

Environment

Himalayan Ski Village in Manali : A boon for tourism industry or an ecological blunder?

Published

on

Huge projects such as the Himalayan Ski Village in Manali, are likely to boost the development of tourism industry in Himachal, but might result in ecological disaster.

On June 5, 2006, then chief minister of Himachal Pradesh, signed an implementation agreement involving the $350 million Himalayan Ski Village on a 94 hectare area in Kullu district, promoted by Alfred Ford, American business tycoon and great-grandson of well-known Henry Ford. The approval of the agreement later in 2007 was challenged by BJP government and resulted in a delay of four and a half years. The approval was challenged on environmental grounds and issues related to the effect of the project on the local population and resources. An appeal was made in the High Court to seek the cancellation of the project.

It was the part of the vendetta between the party in power and the opposition. The cancellation of the proposed establishment worth Rs. 16,00 crore would have been a great blow to the rivals. However, High Court gave green light to resume the work on the project, passed during the reign of Congress. High Court recently annulled the show cause notice served for cancelling by the State government.

The judgment by Justice Rajiv Sharma said:

“It is duly established that the state government had already made up its mind to cancel the project and the issuance of notice based on the recommendations of the (state’s high-power) committee was merely a ritual. Even previously, Former Tourism Minister GS Bali has blamed BJP government for creating hurdles without any factual grounds”

The delay in the project was causing an annual loss of Rs.30-50 crore to the state government. The development of the project is being rated high in the global tourism market and the Himalyan Ski resort would put Manali among one of the best ski resort in the world. Even it’s been considered as an alternative to ski resorts of Swiss alps.

The investor had insured that the project involves no environmental impact, rather it would create lively hood for 4000 people and 70% of which would include local residents, which is considered a cunning temptation to gain the trust of the local residents. The DFL Luxury Villas in Shimla has already axed hundreds of trees; a few more like the new complex of Irrigation and Public Health Headquarters on Shimla bye-pass road waiting for opportunities to kill some more. Considering the impact of the construction over natural resources and environment, the luxury ski resort project can lead to exploitation of the local resources on the name of development of tourism industry. Out of total 96 hectare, 78 hectare land is acquired from private owners. Even the local folks are opposing the project on religious grounds.

Even in terms of pollution, the location of the project doesn’t seem to be considered appropriately. Manali is already facing environmental problems due to rapid construction of concrete structure such as hotels/resorts to accommodate huge number of tourists, increasing traffic and pollution. Hydropower projects like the Parbati and Allian Duhangan have also altered the landscape of the region. It’s very hard to consider that no tree would be axed to build such an huge exotic tourist spot that includes 670 room hotel and 132 chalets. You can read the detailed information on the project here including its impacts on local residents, resources and environment. Also, an article on Tehelka titled, ‘A Himalayan Blunder?’ is worth a read.

Moreover, Himachal Pradesh has grabbed great attention from both state and center government as a potential tourism industry. To exploit the full potential, the government is working on transportation infrastructure that would reduce the traffic problem, reduce the traveling cost and time. Two of these huge projects include a 390 miles Bilaspur–Mandi–Leh railway, which will snatch the title of being world’s highest railway track from China’s Qinghai–Tibet Railway with an estimated budgets of Rs 22,831 crore and the 84.380 kms long four-lane project on NH 21 in Himachal worth Rs 2356.20 crore.

After the completion of these two projects, Kullu-Manali would receive maximum benefits as an tourist spot in Himachal. That means more crowds to the region. Each addition, in terms of vehicles and number of tourist visiting Kullu-Manali, means a proportional increase in the carbon footprint. Most of us must be familiar with the phenomenon known as climate change, and if not, then you better be, because in developed countries, climate change, emissions, deforestation, water and energy saving practices are getting a serious concerns from both, the government and citizens.

We know about billions of dollars being spent on the development of tourism industry and transportation in the targeted areas of Himachal, but somewhere that sounds like overexploiting the natural resources, which would eventually lead to the destruction of natural beauty, greenery and pleasant climate, which presently tempts tourists from all over the globe.

Tourism, no doubt, is a major source of revenue for the state, but over exploitation of resources, especially by selling forest and agricultural lands to private investors would cost a lot in terms of ecology. It’s a great step to develop tourist industry in Himachal, but it would be a fatal mistake to encourage deforestation and excess construction.

Madan has studied English Literature and Journalism from HP University and lives in Shimla. He is an amateur photographer and has been writing on topics ranging from environmental, socio-economic, development programs, education, eco-tourism, eco-friendly lifestyle and to green technologies for over 9 years now. He has an inclination for all things green, wonderful and loves to live in solitude. When not writing, he can be seen wandering, trying to capture the world around him in his DSLR lens.

Environment

After 15 Years of Passing of Forest Rights Act, Implementation in Himachal Still in Doldrums, Jeopardizing Ecological Conservation

Published

on

Forest rights fight in himachal pradesh

Shimla-‘Planting a tree to celebrate World Environment Day has been reduced to a symbolic tradition. But is this enough for the conservation of our ecology? The efficacy and use of plantation drives are being questioned all across the world today. These drives, especially when conducted by the government tend to be a wastage of resources due to poor survival rates, said environmental and community groups in Himachal Pradesh in a joint statement released recently on World Environment Day.

Further, trees are just one part of our ecosystem which comprises soil, grasslands, scrubs, wetlands, wildlife and even human beings, the statement said.  

In India, especially in the Himalayas communities have co-existed with nature since times immemorial – dependent on it for day-to-day life and livelihoods, the groups said. Because of this connection between forests and local livelihoods and culture-communities across the landscape fought to protect the ecosystems they inhabit from destruction – be it the Chipko movement in Uttarakhand 50 years ago or the recent struggles in the tribal district of Kinnaur to highlight the ill-effects of dams and hydropower projects – indigenous and forest-dependent people have protected forest resources, they said.

“It is unfortunate then that these historical custodians of forests were labelled ‘encroachers’ and ‘thieves’ as their livelihoods were displaced from forests sometimes to build dams, highways and cities and at other times in the name of conservation were restricted from using the forests citing forest laws,” the statement said.

The groups said this has happened in Himachal too, where communities like pastoralists and farmers are slowly getting alienated from the forests. This jeopardizes their capacity to protect the forests too – whether from natural calamities like fires or indiscriminate felling. 

Forest revival and afforestation programs, it is understood the world over, are only successful when local communities are made in charge and are given full access to use the forest and make decisions about its management.

“We have examples of community forest management like Gramya Jungles of Orissa and Van Panchayats of Uttarakhand. This became part of the Forest Policy in 1988 which is why programs like Joint Forest Management were planned for participatory governance of forests. However, in these too the forest department retained their control and communities were used as labour to plant trees,” the groups highlighted.

Based on these experiences and the repeated evictions of forest-dependent people from their rightful use it became apparent that there was a need for a law that recognised the community’s right to both use and protect/ govern the forest, they said.

It was after years of struggle that the Forest Rights Act 2006 was passed by the parliament of India. The Act recognises individual and community rights over any kind of forest lands for those dependent on these for their bonafide livelihood needs before 13th December 2005. The act also recognises development rights and community management rights. Himachal, where 2/3rd of the landscape is legally classified as ‘forest’ – there is a tremendous need and potential to implement this law to secure the land and livelihood rights of people on forest lands be they for fuelwood, fodder, pastures as well as farming and shelter. 

The statement said today it has been 15 years since the passing of FRA but in Himachal, its implementation is in the doldrums.

“While 20 lakh forest rights claims have been accepted all across the country in Himachal only 164 claims have been recognised whereas 2700 are pending with the administration at various levels. The key reasons for the poor implementation include – lack of political will, misinformation about the act amongst the line officials, distrust of the people leading to non-filing of claims and inadequate awareness amongst common people,” the statement said.

It further said that, ironically, the state government has shown great enthusiasm in using this act to grant forest land for village development activities, the rest of the rights namely individual and community forest use and management rights are languishing due to state negligence and actively blocking the granting of these rights. 

The groups further highlighted that in the last 5 years, community voices from Kangra, Chamba, Kinnaur, Lahaul-Spiti, Sirmaur and Mandi have been raising the demand for the implementation of this law in the state.  It was after this that the state government was forced to announce that it would implement the Forest Rights Act in a mission mode in the state in 2018. The tribal department also worked on training and making educational material on the act. However, these are yet to be properly distributed at the village level.

The joint statement further added that in March 2020 post the pandemic led lockdown the FRA implementation process received a setback. Even as gram sabha meetings and FRC processes came to a grinding halt the economy too got hit. During this time, it became evident more than ever that it is the land and forest-based livelihoods that are available to rural communities to fall back on for survival. 

“Whereas the Government should be focused on strengthening land and nature-based livelihoods for the local communities. However, the focus of the state remains on pushing destructive commercial ventures in ecologically fragile areas and valuable farmlands of the state,” the groups said.  

The coronavirus has taught the world what the climate crisis had already indicated – that we will continue to be victims of such crisis as long as the ecological destruction continues unabated, the statement said.

“This calls for a change in the model of ‘development’ which prioritises the basic needs and services rather than run blindly after economic growth which is meant to profit companies and contractors”, the groups said.

The statement also said that it is the communities who will now have to believe in their own capacity to manage lives and resources and also call the government to account if our natural resources have to be protected for future generations. 

Signatories

  • Ajay Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, Advocate Dinesh, Bhoomiheen Bhoomi Adhikar Manch, Himachal
  • Birbal Chaurhan, Shamlat Sangharsh Samiti, Sirmaur
  • Gulab Singh and Dhaniram Shamra, Sirmaur Van Adhikar Manch
  • Joginder Walia Balh Ghaati Kisaan Sangharsh Samiti, Mandi
  • Jiya Negi, Van Adhikar Samiti, Kinnaur
  • Kulbhushan Upmanyu, Himalaya Bachao Samiti, Chamba
  • Lal Hussain, Ghumantu Pashupalak Mahasabha, Chamba
  • Meera Devi, Nekram,Shyam Singh Chauhan, Paryavaran evam Gram Vikas Samiti, Karsog, Mandi
  • Himshi Singh and Prakash Bhandari, Himdhara Environment Research and Action Collective
  • Prem Katoch and Kesang Thakur, Save Lahaul Spiti, Lahaul
  • Tenzin Takpa and Sonam Targey, Spiti Civil Society, Spiti  

Image by OpenClipart-Vectors from Pixabay

Continue Reading

Environment

Himachal: Report Forest Fires on Toll-Free Numbers 1077 and 1070

Published

on

helpline for Forest Fires in himachal pradesh

Shimla-Forest fire is a recurrent annual phenomenon in Himachal Pradesh and causes losses worth several crores every year. Dry spell and summers make forests, especially chir pine forests, highly vulnerable to forest fires. These forest fires not only damage the forest wealth but also hit wildlife and biodiversity in general. The forest department attributes most fires to human factors.

Like every year, the forest department has claimed that it is all geared up and ready to combat forest fires this year too. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Dr. Savita on Monday held a virtual review meeting with Forest Circles on preparedness for forest fires in the state.

She said that the Forest department was well prepared to fight the forest fires and a rapid forest fire fighting force and rapid response teams had been set up at forest division and range levels.

“Approximately 40,000 man-days of fire watchers would be engaged by the department in addition to existing frontline staff for preventing and combating forest fires,” she said. The state disaster control room with toll-free number 1077 at the state level and 1070 at the district level were operational for reporting of the forest fire by the local community, she informed.

Dr. Savita said messages regarding forest fire had been shared with the members of the rapid forest fire fighting force, in which approximately 50,000 volunteers had already been registered. Awareness to the community was also conducted through Nukkar Nataks, songs, speeches and other activities at different locations in the state. Besides, a massive state-level awareness program was also conducted at 45 places from 10 to 17 March 2021

She said that the department had created forest fire lines and did control burning and also constructed water storage structures in the forest areas to combat forest fires. Additional multi-utility vehicles and water loaded tankers in 80 fire-sensitive ranges had been engaged for three months. She that matter regarding Standard Operating Systems (SOPs) for requisition of helicopter services for dousing the forest fires had been sent to the Government for approval. 

Feature Photo: Unsplash@Thematthoward

Continue Reading

Environment

Himachal Counts 108,578 Waterbirds of 96 Species This Year With Increase in Habitat

Published

on

Annual Bird Count in Himachal Pradesh 2021

Shimla-The habitat of migratory and resident water-birds in Himachal Pradesh has gradually improved, said Forest Minister Rakesh Pathania.

The annual water-bird count at Pong Dam Lake Wildlife Sanctuary was conducted in the first of February, 2021 and the exercise was conducted under restrained conditions due to the prevailing Avian Influenza outbreak in Pong Dam Lake as well as the COVID-19 Pandemic, he said.

The exercise was conducted by Wildlife wing of Himachal Pradesh by deploying 57 staff members in 26 sections of the sanctuary for counting the water-dependent birds.

Total 108,578 birds of 96 species were counted during this year. Out of the total number, 101,431 of 51 species are water-dependent migratory birds and 6,433 of 29 species are water-dependent resident birds. As many as 714 birds of 16 other species were also recorded. The total population of the flagship species, Bar-Headed Geese, is 40,570.

The other species which have higher population count during this year are Eurasian Coot (24,163), Northern Pintail (12,702), Common Teal (8,444), Little Cormorant (3,649), Great Cormorant (3,410), Grey Lag Goose (2,297), Northern Shoveler (2,275) and Common Pochard (2,138). The species which find noticeable mention are Red Necked Grebe, Great Bittern, Lesser White-Fronted Goose, Red Crested Pochard, Ferruginous Pochard, Pied Avocet, Northern Lapwing, Peregrine Falcon etc. During the counting exercise, one Bar-headed Goose and one Grey Lag Goose with collars were also spotted.

This year the Annual bird count exercise assumes significance, considering the Avian Influenza outbreak in the Wildlife Sanctuary. Further, the Minister expressed satisfaction over the timely and effective containment measures taken by Wildlife Wing to control and contain Avian Influenza outbreak in the Wildlife Sanctuary.

PCCF (Wildlife) Archana Sharma and CCF Wildlife (North) Dharamshala Upasana Patial also participated and supervised the Annual Water Bird Count.

The total population of birds, as well as number of species, counted this year are marginally less as compared to last year, probably due to the impact of Avian Influenza outbreak which was first reported on 28th December 2020.

Although the total population of water birds declined during the peak of the Avian Influenza outbreak, there is a gradual increase in the total population of birds, the Minister informed.

Continue Reading

Trending