D’sala Slum Demolition: Now district admin adopts ‘Jungle Raj’, threatens homeless dwellers and activists helping them
DHARAMSALA- The district administration of Dharamsala has now crossed limits of wretchedness. Allegedly, the administration is using police to silence protesting homeless slum dwellers of CharanKhad slum in Dharamsala. Activists trying to help evicted dwellers are also being threatened by the police.
According to The Tribune,
Requesting anonymity, the activist alleged that they had been called by the police and threatened against raising their voice for the evicted slum-dwellers.
Chased Away by Villagers, Again on Road
People from both Dharamsala town and villages are equally apathetic to these dwellers, who include over 150 school going children, infants, elderly, and daily wagers. It is noticeworthy that this sudden need to demolish such and old slum with just 10 day notice arose only after Dharamsala was listed for smart city project.
About 800 dwellers of 30-40-years-old slum at CharanKhad, which was demolished last Saturday (June 17) after forceful eviction by district administration of Kangra, are still wandering on roads to find shelter.
Villages and panchayats chased them away saying they don’t want “criminals and lowlife migrants” to settle anywhere on their panchayat area. Municipal Corporation of Dharamsala (MCD) and district administration didn’t even arrange for relocation, so there is no question of rehabilitating them.
Rights, it seems, provided by the constitution of India for its citizens do not apply to slum-dwellers because they are poor, unprivileged and deprived section of the society. Poverty-stricken people are not considered as citizens of India. Wealthy and powerful can buy land in Himachal and construct villas to spend summers in Shimla, such as PriyankaVadra. But the government is tightlipped when it comes to rehabilitating some 800 marginalized lives.
According to the Tribune,
Dagwarpanchayat had resolved against those villagers who had given land on rent to the evicted slum-dwellers. After this, the villagers who had initially given land on lease to the slum-dwellers, had now asked them to vacate it. Similarly, at Chatru village a local land owner had initially given land on lease to the slum-dwellers. They cleared the land for setting up their temporary huts, but later the land owner asked them to move away from the place as his kin were averse to slum-dwellers being settled in their vicinity.
Hatred of villagers towards slum people
An activist fighting for these homeless dwellers explained the hatred and intolerance villagers and people in Dharamsala are meting out towards these unfortunate migrants, who are mostly daily wagers or beggars.
“They have given them land on rent to put up their huts. However, nobody was ready to accept the slum-dwellers from Maharashtra. There are about 70 families from Maharashtra who had been staying here for the last about three decades. Most of them are labourers or rag-pickers. They are performing the important job of scavengers in Dharamsala town picking up and selling all recyclable solid waste,” he said.
District administration had given a 10 day notice to slum dwellers asking them to evict their huts. The notice said that open defecation by dwellers is contaminating CharanKhad and poses threat of jaundice outbreak. The admin further went on declaring the slum as a highly unhygienic place that could lead to epidemics. However, there is no word about any sample testing from ChranaKhad or any evidence regarding what the district admin alleged.
The administration had assured the slum dwellers that they would be provided place to relocation and basic facilities like toilets and water supply will be ensured wherever they are relocated. Instead of providing toilets, HP government came up with a much simpler plan to check open defecation – it demolished the slum. The government expected homeless dwellers to capture some other region, out of town where they will be allowed to defecate openly. How did it prevent people defecating in open? This then turns out as MCD’s plan to simply change their location and provide them no place to go.
The dwellers also alleged that villagers told them that administration has threatened panchayatpradhans of legal action if they rented land or helped them to settle on panchayat land. Only a couple of NGOs and some activists are trying to raise the issue but hardly any Hindi or English daily (Except Hindustan Times) is covering their misery.
Surprisingly, a couple of days ago, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had restrained the Chandigarh Administration from forcibly evicting slum-dwellers from five slums and labour colonies in the city. A vacation Bench of the High Court observed that the City Beautiful would not remain “beautiful” in case the services of slum-dwellers were no longer available.
In a petition, the court was told around 1,500 people putting up in slums and colonies were under a constant threat of demolition and forcible eviction by the Chandigarh Administration. In case the demolition was carried out, the dwellers would be without shelter during the monsoon. The petitioner had also contended that the dwellers should first be rehabilitated by providing alternative accommodation.
However, in Himachal, our honorable High Court rejected the petition filed by slum dwellers and is not interested in taking notice of apathy and injustice done to the poorest section of the society.